UNSW COPYRIGHT FORUM



The Australian Journal of Management
  • The AJM was first published in 1976.

  • Australia's leading management journal:

    • for academic researchers
    • for preeminent practitioners
    • here and overseas

  • with double-blind reviewing
  • and standard publication protocols
  • widely cited
  • traditional format

The Electronic Australian Journal of Management
  • Two years ago we received an AVCC grant:

  • to study reader acceptance of an electronic version of the AJM, that is, an on-line version.

  • The AGSM assembled an interdisciplinary team:

    • to study the state of the art of management journal publication

    • to develop and refine an on-line prototype

    • to test consumer adoption and usage patterns of an on-line journal

The EAJM project's goals and objectives:

  • to promulgate the research output of the Australian management community to a wider audience both within Australian academic institutions and internationally

  • to research, develop, and pilot-test on-line delivery systems

  • to report on best practice in on-line publishing practice in the area of management research

  • to study and understand the dynamics of adoption of on-line available research, including the development of a model of adoption behaviour

  • to use the vehicle of on-line publication to investigate ways in which research can be delivered more flexibly than possible with hard-copy publishing

  • to promulgate the research findings from the project

By mounting the AJM in an on-line format, we have the potential to provide a platform from which to develop other on-line products, which will expand the reach of Australian management research performed in all Australian universities.

Benefits include:

  • wider dissemination of the AJM and associated research materials

  • earlier dissemination of significant research results

  • opening up on-line debate to parallel provocative articles in the AJM

  • developing substantive knowledge in the understanding of adoption patterns of on-line media

  • experimenting with product design to allow more flexible forms of publication.

Three stages of the project:

  1. Analysis of technology and review of current sites.

  2. Construction of a prototype of the EAJM

  3. Consumer response and analysis.

Analysis of technology and review of current sites.

Technological issues:
  • Standards:

    HTML, PDF, SGML, other

  • Presentation:

    • wholly on-line v. on-line version of paper journal
    • formulas, tables, non-ASCII characters
    • conversion of back issues
    • production of future issues

  • Design:

    structure, graphics, growth, options

  • Options:

    • interactivity with readers/subscribers

    • search engines/indices

    • hyperlinks to data, discussions, footnotes, graphics, editors, etc

    • legibility and readability of on-line version

    • usage counters/guestbook

    • recording origins of on-line browsings

    • provision of advice:

      to readers, subscribers, authors

    • different delivery options:

      email notification, emailing abstracts to subscribers, provision of on-line reading software


Construction of a prototype of the EAJM

.
Issues:
  • Copyright

  • Costs and pricing:
    • free
    • subscription
    • site licence
    • pay per article
      (direct, or through an intermediary)
    • hourly search time
    • other: cost to produce, maintenance of existing files

  • Archiving:

    • cost
    • location
    • technological obsolescence
    • physical stability of storage media
    • maintenance

  • Peer review:

    • standard articles
    • commentaries
    • on-line discussion

  • On-going development

Our first effort mirrored the appearance of the hard-copy version.

The final version (so far) has benefitted from a Web-page designer.


Consumer response and analysis.

We keep a watch over "hits" on the EAJM pages here, with specific details here.

Issues:

  • User preferences and perceptions of electronic media:

    • read on-line v. print off to read
    • speed
    • quality
    • ease of use
    • format

  • User behaviour and access:

    • existing hardware ownership
    • existing software familiarity
    • emergence of standards
    • networking experience

  • Field trials and other publishers' experience.





Robert Marks, bobm@agsm.edu.au

9 July, 1997